Case 2215125/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. Julie Hunt v Bloomsbury Business Centres Ltd Held: By CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 2215125/2023
- Decision date
- 8 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Craft Members
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. Julie Hunt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Julie Hunt brought claims against Bloomsbury Business Centres Ltd. The respondent filed no response and did not attend the CVP hearing before Employment Judge Craft on 8 January 2024. The tribunal therefore made a short liability and remedy judgment on the material monetary claims recorded in the decision.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a statutory redundancy payment of £3,680.28. It also ordered damages for breach of contract in the sum of £2,287.76, identifying the breach as the failure to pay the statutory notice payable to the claimant on her dismissal.
In addition, the tribunal ordered payment of £511.15 for five days' accrued holiday pay due on termination of employment. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal ordered payment of a statutory redundancy payment in this sum. | Upheld | — | £3,680 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded damages for breach of contract for failure to pay statutory notice on dismissal. | Upheld | — | £2,288 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded five days' accrued holiday pay on termination. | Upheld | — | £511 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,479
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.