Case 2215142/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Yousaf Ali v VVitec — 2023
- Case reference
- 2215142/2023
- Decision date
- 19 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Yousaf Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3, so Regional Employment Judge Freer determined the case on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing. The hearing listed for 20 December 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant in the sum of £1,038.00. It therefore ordered the respondent to pay that amount to the claimant and to account to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due on the sum as appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent did not file an ET3. The tribunal determined the claim on the papers without a hearing. | Upheld | — | £1,038 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,038
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.