Case 2215315/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2215315/2023
- Decision date
- 10 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Hodgson Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was treated as the claimant's third claim against the respondent. At an earlier preliminary hearing, the claimant withdrew claims of gender reassignment and sexual orientation discrimination, and the remaining case was confined to three factual matters said to be race discrimination or victimisation.
The tribunal refused the claimant's postponement application, finding there was insufficient medical or other evidence to show that he was unable to deal with the hearing. It then considered the respondent's strike-out application and found that each of the three alleged detriments had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal also considered whether the claim form contained any other potential claims. It found that any residual claims were too poorly pleaded to identify or fairly determine, and struck out the claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender reassignment discrimination | The claimant withdrew any claim of discrimination on the grounds of gender reassignment at the earlier preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | Gender reassignment | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal identified three alleged detriments said to be race discrimination and found they had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal identified the same three alleged detriments as victimisation allegations and found they had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The claimant withdrew any claim of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation at the earlier preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- no reasonable prospect of success
- Bryant
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.