Case 2215363/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A. Coles v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2215363/2023
- Decision date
- 9 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs A. Coles
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs A. Coles, presented a claim on 9 October 2023 for one month’s unpaid wages and holiday pay on termination of employment. The claim was sent to ORU London Ltd on 6 February 2024, but the respondent did not file a response or seek an extension of time, so judgment was entered in default under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On unpaid wages, the tribunal recorded that the claimant had worked as operations manager for 40 hours a week from 7 March 2023 to 7 August 2023. Relying on a payslip confirming the monthly amount payable, Employment Judge Goodman found that £2,893 gross was due and ordered payment of that sum as unauthorised deductions from wages.
On holiday pay, the claimant had only stated a total figure and had not provided a breakdown. The tribunal calculated accrued but untaken holiday on the basis of five complete months’ employment, 28 days' annual entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998, and four statutory bank holidays during the period. On the tribunal’s arithmetic, the claimant had 7.67 days outstanding at £131 per day, giving £1,004.77 in the reasons; the operative order at the top of the judgment states £1,000.47, so there is a small inconsistency in the holiday-pay figure recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment; the tribunal accepted the payslip evidence and found £2,893 gross remained due for unpaid final wages. | Upheld | — | £2,893 |
| Holiday pay | The reasons calculate £1,004.77 under the Working Time Regulations 1998, although the order at the top of the judgment states £1,000.47. | Upheld | — | £1,005 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,898
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.