Case 2215381/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Francesco Angelini v Kaizen Reporting Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2215381/2023
- Decision date
- 23 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Francesco Angelini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Francesco Angelini brought a claim against Kaizen Reporting Limited in the Employment Tribunal at London Central, heard on 12 and 13 February 2024 before Tribunal Judge Peer acting as an Employment Judge. The written judgment records a single liability finding: the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal also directed that there should be a 50% reduction to the claimant’s compensatory award. The written record does not set out the underlying compensatory figure or any final monetary total.
The decision notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The public record therefore contains the outcome and the reduction direction, but not a fuller explanation of the factual or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and that there should be a 50% reduction to the compensatory award, but it does not state the monetary amount in the written record. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.