Case 2215638/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W. Griffith v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis — 2024
- Case reference
- 2215638/2023
- Decision date
- 19 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peer Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W. Griffith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London Central by CVP on 6 March 2024 before Employment Judge Peer. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal struck out the claim of unfair dismissal under Employment Tribunal Procedure Rule 37(1)(a). The stated reason was that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Procedure Rule 37(1)(a) because the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction and the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rule 37(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.