Case 2216003/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Magee v Scale Facilitation Operations Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216003/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge H Clark Representation
- Venue
- London Central via Cloud Video Platform
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss L Magee
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 5 January 2024 before Employment Judge H Clark at London Central via the Cloud Video Platform, the claimant, Miss L Magee, appeared in person. The respondents, Scale Facilitation Operations Limited and Recharge Production UK Limited, did not appear and did not file response forms.
The tribunal upheld two unlawful deduction from wages claims. It found that the respondents unlawfully deducted £63,790.79 from the claimant's wages and separately unlawfully deducted £7,608.50 by way of accrued annual leave payments. The judgment records those sums as the tribunal's findings and does not set out further written reasons, noting that reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondents unlawfully deducted this sum from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £63,791 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondents unlawfully deducted this sum from the claimant's wages by way of accrued annual leave payments. | Upheld | — | £7,609 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £71,399
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.