Case 2216054/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T.C. Trigo v Premier Palletised Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216054/2024
- Decision date
- 5 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T.C. Trigo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to attend the hearing or defend the claim issued on 6 March 2024. The tribunal refused an extension of time to defend the claim and determined that the claim could properly be decided under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages by failing to pay wages for the period 26 January 2024 to 6 February 2024. It also found that the holiday pay claim succeeded for one day of holiday accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to attend or defend the claim; award stated as a gross sum for wages from 26 January 2024 to 6 February 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,050 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated as the gross sum due for one day of holiday accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £107 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,157
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2013 Rule 21
- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2013 Rule 30A(2)
- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2013 Rule 20
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.