Case 2216130/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms O Pacholec v Scotlink Limited t/a Harley Psychiatrists — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216130/2023
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms O Pacholec
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 23 February 2024 at London Central by CVP, before Employment Judge Emery, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr E Vartikovski. The judgment records that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal held that the complaint of a failure to pay sums contractually due to the claimant was well-founded. The judgment identifies the relevant sum as legal costs incurred by the claimant following a Panorama TV programme.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the balance of those legal costs. The amount awarded was £7,054.60. No separate breakdown of the award into statutory heads is given in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a failure to pay sums contractually due to the claimant, described as payment of legal costs incurred following a Panorama TV programme. It ordered payment of the balance of those legal costs. | Upheld | — | £7,055 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,055
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.