Case 2216151/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Ludin v Department for Education Heard via Cloud Video Platform (London Central) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216151/2024
- Decision date
- 14 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Ludin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a preliminary issue about whether Mr Ludin had any contractual claim arising from the withdrawal of an offer for a PA Apprentice role. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had been placed on a reserve list, later told he had a provisional offer, and informed that the offer remained conditional on completion of ID, right to work and pre-employment checks, including references.
The tribunal found that by mid-January 2024 the only outstanding matter was the receipt of references, which were one of the conditions of the offer. It held that so long as the offer remained conditional and the conditions had not been met, it could be withdrawn by the respondent. The tribunal accepted there was enough to support the claimant's point that the 19 January 2024 email was sent to a different email address, but there was insufficient evidence to uphold his allegation that the email had been faked.
The tribunal concluded that the respondent withdrew the offer on 31 January 2024 before the claimant's referees sent references later that evening. Applying the principle that there must be an unconditional offer and acceptance to form a contract, the tribunal held there was no concluded contract of employment. Because there was no employment contract, the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the complaint, which was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant described the claim as 'withdrawal of offer' on the ET1 and clarified at the hearing that he was bringing a claim for breach of a verbal contract. The tribunal dismissed the claim because it found there was no concluded contract of employment and therefore no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- employment tribunal jurisdiction limited to claims arising on termination of employment
- unconditional offer and acceptance required to form a valid contract
- conditional offer can be withdrawn before valid acceptance
- compliance with conditions after withdrawal does not resurrect the offer
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.