Case 2216265/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Neither present nor represented v Ms R Jervis (Solicitor) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216265/2024
- Decision date
- 4 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Neither present nor represented
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Glennie at London Central on 30 September 2024. The claimant, Mr J Berry, was neither present nor represented. The respondent was represented by Ms R Jervis, solicitor.
The Tribunal’s judgment was that the claim was struck out under rule 57(1) of the Rules of Procedure. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with an order of the Tribunal and/or had not actively pursued the claim and/or that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing in respect of the claim.
The extracted judgment text does not set out the underlying factual allegations or any substantive liability findings. It records only the strike-out decision and the procedural basis for that decision. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not describe the underlying allegations. It states only that the claim was struck out under rule 57(1) on the grounds that the claimant had not complied with an order of the Tribunal and/or had not actively pursued the claim and/or that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 57(1) of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.