Case 2216266/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Drury v Wolf Data Systems Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216266/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt Representation
- Venue
- By CVP at London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Drury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP at London Central Employment Tribunal on 28 February 2024 before Employment Judge Platt. The Claimant, Miss E Drury, appeared in person and the Respondent did not attend. The judgment was issued as a Rule 21 judgment and recorded that the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant.
The tribunal upheld the Claimant’s remaining claims for four days’ holiday pay, one month’s contractual notice pay, and unlawful deductions from wages in respect of arrears of pay for July to September 2023. It recorded that the holiday pay claim was for four days at £99.96 net per day, the notice claim was for one month’s contractual notice pay, and the wages claim covered arrears for July, August and six days in September 2023.
The Respondent was ordered to pay net sums of £399.84 for holiday pay, £2,165.95 for notice pay, and £4,645.72 for arrears of pay. The arrears were broken down in the judgment as July £1,880 net, August £2,165.76 net, and six days of September 2023 £599.76 net, giving a total award of £7,211.51.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Four days' holiday pay at £99.96 net per day. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Breach of contract | One month’s contractual notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,166 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay for July to September 2023, including July £1,880 net, August £2,165.76 net and six days of September 2023 £599.76 net. | Upheld | — | £4,646 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,212
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.