Case 2216286/2023 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Ms B Omotosho, Tribunal advocate — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216286/2023
- Decision date
- 17 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov Tribunal
- Panel members
- I Allwright, L Venner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing in London Central on 11 September 2024, before Employment Judge P Klimov with tribunal members I Allwright and L Venner, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms B Omotosho. The claimant's application to postpone the hearing failed and was dismissed.
The tribunal unanimously struck out the claim. It found that the manner in which the proceedings had been conducted by the claimant was unreasonable, within Rule 37(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing in respect of the claim, within Rule 37(1)(e).
The judgment does not contain any merits findings on the underlying pleaded causes of action and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(b) and Rule 37(1)(e) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It did not determine the merits of this pleaded claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(b) and Rule 37(1)(e) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It did not determine the merits of this pleaded claim. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(b) and Rule 37(1)(e) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It did not determine the merits of this pleaded claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 37(1)(e) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.