Case 2216314/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Cassaro v The Electoral Commission — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216314/2023
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Cassaro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit of GBP120 following a preliminary hearing on 4 October 2024. The order was sent to the claimant on 21 October 2024.
The claimant failed to pay the deposit. The tribunal therefore struck out all complaints contained in the claim under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and the hearing listed for 9 to 11 December 2024 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The PDF text states that all complaints contained in the claim were struck out after non-payment of a deposit. It does not set out the complaints individually; the claim type follows the gov.uk listing category supplied in the prompt. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The PDF text states that all complaints contained in the claim were struck out after non-payment of a deposit. It does not set out the complaints individually; the claim type follows the gov.uk listing category supplied in the prompt. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.