Case 2216370/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Guinee v PGMBM Law Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2216370/2023
- Decision date
- 10 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Ms G Carpenter, Dr V Weerasinghe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Guinee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at London Central and hearing the case from 24 to 28 February 2025 and on 3 March 2025, heard the Claimant in person and counsel for the Respondent. Its unanimous judgment was that Miss C Guinee's complaints of direct discrimination because of disability, direct discrimination because of sex, failure to make reasonable adjustments, victimisation and breach of contract were not well-founded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination because of disability; found not well-founded and also out of time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct discrimination because of sex; found not well-founded and also out of time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments; found not well-founded and also out of time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Found not well-founded and also out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Found not well-founded and also out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.