Case 2216430/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Patykivskyi v City Site Solutions and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2216430/2023
- Decision date
- 6 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Patykivskyi
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London Central hearing on 27 and 28 February 2025, before Employment Judge Adkin, the claimant appeared in person, the first respondent was represented by its director, and the second respondent was represented by its managing director. The tribunal dismissed the complaint of direct race discrimination under sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010, and all complaints against City Site Solutions Ltd were dismissed.
The tribunal found that Mr Patykivskyi was a worker within the meaning of section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the holiday pay claim was well founded against Rocket PAYE Ltd.
The parties did not dispute the holiday pay calculation at the hearing. The tribunal recorded that the claimant worked 147 days and was paid £16,637.76 gross in total, equivalent to £113.18 per day. On the stated pro rata calculation, 29.4 weeks of work represented 56.5% of a full year, producing an entitlement to 15.5 days' leave and gross accrued but unpaid holiday pay of £1,754.32.
The order required the second respondent to pay £1,754.32 gross, subject to the appropriate deduction of income tax and national insurance. Written reasons were requested only in relation to the race discrimination complaint and were to be provided separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The complaint of direct race discrimination under sections 13 and 39 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. Written reasons were requested only for this complaint and were to be provided separately. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was a worker within section 230(3)(b) ERA 1996 and accepted the parties' quantum calculation. The award of £1,754.32 was gross and subject to deduction for income tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,754 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,754
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 13 and 39 Equality Act 2010
- section 230(3)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.