Case 2216709/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Borich v GSD Painting Contracts London Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216709/2024
- Decision date
- 23 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hodgson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Borich
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hodgson had made a case management order on 10 July 2024 requiring the claimant to provide further information about his claim. The order stated that if the information was not provided by 23 July 2024, the claim would be struck out without further warning or order.
The claimant did not provide any of the ordered information and did not correspond with the Tribunal or the respondent to explain the failure. In those circumstances, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 for failure to comply with the unless order. The hearing listed for 25 October 2024 was therefore vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim for failure to comply with the unless order. It does not separately determine the breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment strikes out the claim for failure to comply with the unless order. It does not separately determine the breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- unless order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.