Case 2216928/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 2216928/2023
- Decision date
- 31 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr P Alleyne, Mr J Carroll
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London Central before Employment Judge Glennie with lay members Mr P Alleyne and Mr J Carroll, heard the claim in January 2025. In its unanimous judgment, it dismissed the claimant's complaints of unfair constructive dismissal, detriment on the ground of making protected disclosures, and unlawful deduction from wages.
The extracted judgment text does not set out the tribunal's reasons, legal analysis, or any findings on remedy beyond the fact of dismissal. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as a detriment complaint on the ground of making protected disclosures, and it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction from wages complaint was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment refers to a complaint of unfair constructive dismissal, which was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.