Case 2216934/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Calverley v Portside Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2216934/2023
- Decision date
- 11 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sent
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Calverley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T Calverley brought claims against Portside Group Ltd for unauthorised deduction of wages. At a public hearing on 5 July 2024 before Tribunal Judge Plowright, sitting alone, the tribunal found the claim in relation to arrears of pay well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £2,348.49 gross.
The tribunal also found the claim in relation to holiday pay well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £1,506.85 gross. The total gross sum ordered was £3,855.34, and the claimant was responsible for tax and National Insurance on that amount. The decision record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | £2,348 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,507 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,855
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.