Case 2217573/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Ahmed and Others v Inland Limited (in administration) and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2217573/2023
- Decision date
- 4 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr I Ahmed and Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNeither respondent contested the claim, and the administrator consented to the proceedings for a protective award continuing against the First Respondent.
The Tribunal found that the First Respondent proposed to dismiss as redundant more than 20 employees at its Head Office establishment and was under a duty to consult with the Claimants under section 188 of TULRCA 1992. It found that the First Respondent failed to comply with any of those consultation obligations.
The complaint for a protective award was well-founded and succeeded. The First Respondent was ordered to pay remuneration to the listed Claimants for a protective award period of 90 days commencing on 31 October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award complaint under section 188 TULRCA 1992 for failure to consult about proposed redundancy dismissals; no monetary amount was specified. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.