Case 2217703/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Bada v Openreach Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2217703/2023
- Decision date
- 5 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Bada
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London Central Employment Tribunal by cloud video platform on 16 and 17 May 2024, before Employment Judge Nash. The claimant represented himself and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The judgment records that the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant contrary to s103A Employment Rights Act 1996, and did not unfairly dismiss the claimant contrary to s98 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claims were dismissed. No written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant contrary to s103A Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the respondent did not unfairly dismiss the claimant contrary to s98 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- s98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.