Case 2217740/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hillier v Transport UK East Anglia Limited Trading As Greater Anglia FULL MERITS LIABILITY HEARING AT LONDON CENTRAL Heard by CVP on 17-19 February 2025 — 2025
- Case reference
- 2217740/2024
- Decision date
- 26 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicolle Non-legal
- Panel members
- Mr T Ashby, Mr P de Chaumont-Rambert
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a full merits liability hearing in Mr A Hillier's claim against Transport UK East Anglia Limited trading as Greater Anglia, heard by CVP on 17-19 February 2025 before Employment Judge Nicolle with non-legal members Mr T Ashby and Mr P de Chaumont-Rambert. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing and the written judgment records only the liability outcome.
The tribunal held that the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim under section 95(1)(c) and section 98(1)-(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 failed and was dismissed. No remedy was awarded because the claim did not succeed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claim for constructive unfair dismissal under section 95(1)(c) and section 98(1)-(4) ERA 1996 fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- section 98(1)-(4) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.