Case 2217743/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Soheil Houshangifar v AI Forge London Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2217743/2024
- Decision date
- 23 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Appearances
- Venue
- in public
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Soheil Houshangifar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Soheil Houshangifar brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages covering arrears of pay and unpaid annual leave. The respondent's response was late and contained no substantive defence; it effectively accepted that payment was in arrears and said it wished to settle once funding was obtained. No explanation was provided for the late response after the tribunal invited one, so the case proceeded undefended.
On the figures, the tribunal accepted that the claimant was paid £27,000 gross per year, or £2,250 per month. It found that he had not been paid for December 2023, January 2024 and half of February 2024, giving a gross sum of £5,625, and then gave credit for £2,865.56 received from the respondent on 29 May 2024. That left £2,763.44 unpaid salary owing. The tribunal also accepted the claimant's calculation of 2.5 days accrued but unpaid annual leave at a daily rate of £103.85, producing £259.62.
The tribunal held that the unlawful deduction from wages claim was well founded and ordered payment of the two net sums, plus provision of pay information showing the deductions for tax and national insurance. The claimant had also sought compensation for financial losses said to have been caused by the unpaid wages, including moving costs and credit card charges and interest, but he did not have documentary evidence at the hearing. That part of the claim was stayed under section 24(2) ERA 1996 and would stand dismissed on 17 January 2025 if there was no request for a further hearing and no application for reconsideration. The tribunal also said the claimant could not recover for mental distress.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim well founded under sections 13 and 23 ERA 1996 and awarded £2,763.44 unpaid salary plus £259.62 unpaid holiday, net of tax and national insurance. It also directed the respondent to provide details of deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,023 |
| Other | The claimant's claim for financial losses caused by non-payment of wages under section 24(2) ERA 1996 was stayed; it was to stand dismissed on 17 January 2025 if neither party requested a further hearing and no reconsideration was sought. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,023
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.24(2) ERA 1996
- rule 20 extension of time
- rules 70-72 reconsideration
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.