Case 2217775/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Eva Randyskova and Mr Simone Erriquez v Your Coffee Hub Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2217775/2024
- Decision date
- 16 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Duff REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Eva Randyskova and Mr Simone Erriquez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the respondent’s oral application for an extension of time to present a response under rule 20(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It also found that both claimants were employees of the respondent within the meaning of section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 until their respective terminations of employment.
On the written pay statement claim, the tribunal held that the respondent failed to give the claimants written itemised pay statements as required by section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996. The periods identified were 12/08/2022 to 31/10/2023 for Ms Eva Randyskova and 15/11/2022 to 31/01/2024 for Mr Simone Erriquez. No separate monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Failure to provide written itemised pay statements under section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996 for Ms Eva Randyskova and Mr Simone Erriquez during the periods stated in the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 20(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.