Case 2217785/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Quais v Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust Heard at London Central on 9 & 10 September 2025 — 2025
- Case reference
- 2217785/2024
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henderson Attendances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Quais
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim that an email sent by the respondent's Finance Process Manager on 10 April 2024, the Festival of Eid, was direct discrimination on grounds of religion. Earlier claims about a delayed reference and alleged bullying or harassment over repayment of an alleged overpayment had been struck out at a case management hearing, and the direct religious discrimination allegation was the sole claim permitted to proceed.
The tribunal held that the claim was out of time and did not exercise its discretion to extend time on a just and equitable basis. It noted that the claimant had not explained the delay or presented evidence as to why time should be extended.
The tribunal also stated that, if it were wrong on time limits, the claimant would not have established direct discrimination. It accepted evidence that Mr Omosebi did not know the exact date of Eid in 2024, would have acted in the same way toward a non-Muslim debtor in the same circumstances, and had no control over when the claimant read the email.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states the claim for direct discrimination on the ground of religion was out of time and dismissed. It also states that, if the time limit decision were wrong, the claimant would not have established direct discrimination on the evidence. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable ground to extend time
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link 2003 IRLR 434, CA
- Equality Act 2010 section 13
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.