Case 2217877/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Anderson v Just Technologies AS — 2024
- Case reference
- 2217877/2024
- Decision date
- 20 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Forde
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal did not determine the merits of the underlying dispute. Its judgment records that the respondent's response was struck out because the respondent had not complied with the unless order dated 14 August 2024.
By letter dated 18 October 2024, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the response should not be struck out. The Tribunal found that the respondent failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The order therefore states that the response is struck out. The judgment also records that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine any substantive claim. It strikes out the respondent's response because the respondent had not complied with the unless order dated 14 August 2024 and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter of 18 October 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.