Case 2218134/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Dawn Mason inc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2218134/2024
- Decision date
- 24 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brown Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was for unlawful deductions from wages. Employment Judge Brown, sitting at London Central by CVP on 18 July 2024, found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant for 10 hours' work on 15 January 2024, 24 January 2024, 31 January 2024 and 14 February 2024, and for 4 hours' work on 8 January 2024. The judgment records an hourly rate of £10.42 gross.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £375.12 gross on account of those unlawful deductions from wages. The judgment states that the payment is to be made net of any tax and NI due, with the Respondent accounting to HMRC for those sums. No other remedy or separate award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions because the Respondent did not pay the Claimant for 10 hours' work on 15 January 2024, 24 January 2024, 31 January 2024 and 14 February 2024, and for 4 hours' work on 8 January 2024, at £10.42 gross per hour. | Upheld | — | £375 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £375
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.