Case 2218424/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Saima Javaid v Playhouse Day Nursery — 2025
- Case reference
- 2218424/2024
- Decision date
- 10 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Saima Javaid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Saima Javaid brought complaints against Playhouse Day Nursery and that they were all heard at London Central by CVP on 8 July 2025 before Employment Judge Khan, sitting alone. The extracted text does not set out separate findings on each issue, but it does record the tribunal's overall conclusion that all complaints were not well-founded.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the complaints in full. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no separate remedy findings are given.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the extracted judgment text states only that all complaints were not well-founded and dismissed, without separating the disposal by claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the extracted judgment text states only that all complaints were not well-founded and dismissed, without separating the disposal by claim. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Inferred from the gov.uk listing category; the extracted judgment text states only that all complaints were not well-founded and dismissed, without separating the disposal by claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.