Case 2218663/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Elms v Bidvest Noonan (UK) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2218663/2024
- Decision date
- 4 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Elms
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London Central by CVP on 27 and 30 September 2024 before Employment Judge Baty. The claimant represented himself and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, automatically unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 concerning protected disclosures, and wrongful dismissal all failed. No remedy was awarded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as automatically unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 (protected disclosures) and states that it failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of wrongful dismissal failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.