Rianna Chambers v Lucky Chip Limited — 2024

Case reference: 2218805/2024
Decision date: 14 August 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge M. Salter Representation
Venue: London Central

Indexed: 17 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Rianna Chambers

Respondent

Lucky Chip Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear and was not represented at the London Central Employment Tribunal hearing on 8 August 2024.

The tribunal found that, contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages in the sum of £909.85. The respondent was ordered to pay that sum to the claimant, alternatively as damages for breach of contract.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment orders the sum as unlawful deductions from wages, alternatively as damages for breach of contract.	Upheld	—	£910
Breach of contract	The judgment states the same sum is alternatively to be paid as damages for breach of contract, rather than making a separate additional award.	Other	—	—

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £910; across all upheld claims

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.