Case 2218875/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Marie Claire McGlade v HRX Design Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2218875/2024
- Decision date
- 20 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moyler REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Marie Claire McGlade
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 16 May 2025 before Employment Judge Moyler, the respondent did not attend. The tribunal allowed the claimant’s complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that the respondent had not paid the sums shown on the claimant’s payslips for 25 January 2024 and 25 February 2024, and that her pay had in any event been incorrectly calculated under a contractual daily rate of £135 for 15 days worked.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions on 25 January 2024 and 25 February 2024 when the respondent did not pay the sums shown on the payslips, totalling £1,890 gross. It also found the claimant’s pay had been incorrectly calculated under a contractual daily rate of £135 for 15 days worked, and ordered payment of £2,025 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,025 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was contractually entitled to automatic enrolment in a workplace pension scheme, with the respondent required to contribute 3% of salary. Damages were assessed at £52.50. | Upheld | — | £53 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. It found the claimant was entitled to 28 days' annual leave and that 1.5 days had accrued during employment. | Upheld | — | £203 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,280
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.