Case 2219113/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr RFG Eutrope v Roti King Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2219113/2024
- Decision date
- 1 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr RFG Eutrope
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Roti King Limited made unauthorised deductions from Mr RFG Eutrope's wages in relation to pension contributions. It accepted that employee contributions of £146.80 per month over seven months totalled £1,027.60, and employer contributions of £110.10 over four months totalled £440.40. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum deducted, £1,468, and the claimant was responsible for any tax or National Insurance on that amount.
The claimant withdrew his claims for notice pay and outstanding salary, and the tribunal dismissed those claims. His bonus payment claim also failed and was dismissed.
The holiday pay complaint succeeded. The tribunal held that the respondent was in breach of contract in failing to pay for holidays accrued but untaken when employment ended. It awarded £4,321 as gross damages, calculated by reference to an annual salary of £74,900 and a daily rate of £288 for 15 days. The total gross amount ordered to be paid was £5,789.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to pension contributions. It awarded the gross sum deducted, £1,468. | Upheld | — | £1,468 |
| Other | The claimant withdrew his claim for notice pay and outstanding salary; the tribunal dismissed those claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract in failing to pay for holiday accrued but untaken when employment ended. It awarded £4,321 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £4,321 |
| Other | The claimant's bonus payment claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,789
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.