Case 2219201/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Mendes v Sola Restaurant — 2024
- Case reference
- 2219201/2023
- Decision date
- 23 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Mendes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment in the claim brought by Mr N Mendes against Sola Restaurant. The Tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 15 November 2024, it had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. The decision was sent to the parties on 23 December 2024. The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying complaint and records no award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive complaint in the extracted text. The claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued; the Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 15 November 2024 to make representations or request a hearing, but no sufficient representations or hearing request were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.