Case 2219245/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S McCready v Alten Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2219245/2023
- Decision date
- 17 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hopton Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S McCready
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant disclosed that he had multiple sclerosis on 7 August 2023 and asked what adjustments could be made. The tribunal found that the respondent knew about the disability from that date and that the claimant's reduced ability to attend site arose in consequence of disability.
The tribunal found that a requirement to attend site put the claimant at a substantial disadvantage because his impaired autoimmunity made site attendance more dangerous to his health. It found that steps including reduced site attendance, managing on-site work within the team, permitting a respirator, and considering isolated on-site workspace were reasonable, and that the respondent had not shown these would have been unreasonable or impractical.
The unfavourable treatment and reasonable adjustments complaints succeeded. The indirect disability discrimination complaint was dismissed because the tribunal did not have enough evidence to conclude that the relevant PCPs put people with multiple sclerosis as a group at a particular disadvantage compared with people without that condition.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of indirect disability discrimination was dismissed because group disadvantage was not established. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was found well-founded and succeeded. Liability only was decided; remedy hearing to be listed. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was found well-founded and succeeded. Liability only was decided; remedy hearing to be listed. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Selkent factors
- section 19 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.