Case 2219344/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Hare v API Global UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2219344/2024
- Decision date
- 13 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Hare
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Hare, employed by API Global UK Limited since 15 July 2020 and later working as Sales and Mortgage Progression Manager, brought a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages based on commission payments. The respondent did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge B Smith refused the late postponement application, found there were no exceptional circumstances, and proceeded in the respondent's absence after considering its emailed explanations and documents.
The central issue was how commission should be calculated under the claimant's contractual documents. The claimant said commission was payable by reference to the date a contract for residential property sales was issued and later exchanged. The respondent said the arrangement had changed and that commission should be calculated from the date of instruction. The tribunal preferred the claimant's reading of the documents and correspondence, and found there was no sufficient evidence that the claimant had agreed to a worse commission basis from January 2021.
Applying section 13 ERA 1996 and the 'properly payable' test, the tribunal found a series of unauthorised deductions between November 2023 and June 2024 totalling £5,450. It held the claim was in time as a series of deductions and allowed an amendment so that later months could be included, applying the Selkent and Vaughan approach to amendments. The tribunal also noted that the respondent did not provide a real grievance response until 11 June 2024 and a fuller reply until 31 July 2024.
On remedy, the tribunal said it could not award compensation for stress and could not order a future revision of the commission structure. It awarded the gross underpaid sum of £5,450 plus a 10% uplift under the ACAS Code, amounting to £5,995 in total, with the claimant responsible for tax and National Insurance on the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a series of unauthorised deductions from wages/commission from November 2023 to June 2024, totalling £5,450, and then applied a 10% ACAS uplift (£545) to reach £5,995 gross. Paragraph 24 refers to May, June and July 2024, but the detailed findings and calculation run to June 2024; I have treated June 2024 as the final month. | Upheld | — | £5,995 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,995
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.13 ERA 1996 properly payable
- New Century Cleaning Co Ltd v Church [2000] IRLR 27 CA
- s.23 ERA 1996 series of deductions
- s.207B ERA 1996
- Selkent Bus Company v Moore [1996] ICR 836
- Vaughan v Modality Partnership UKEAT/0147/20/BA(V)
- Abercrombie v Aga Rangemaster Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1148
- rule 30A exceptional circumstances
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.