Case 2219389/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ikechi Eye Awa v Greenlight Payroll Services Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2219389/2024
- Decision date
- 14 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr. M.
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ikechi Eye Awa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that, contrary to Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the First Respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages in the sum of £2,084.00.
The First Respondent was ordered to pay that sum to the claimant. The judgment also stated, in the alternative, that the same sum was payable as damages for breach of contract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,084 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the same sum is alternatively to be paid as damages for breach of contract; it does not make a separate additional award for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,084
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.