Case 2219487/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Day v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2025
- Case reference
- 2219487/2024
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Day
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant withdrew her breach of contract complaint, and the tribunal dismissed that complaint upon withdrawal.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint and her discrimination arising from disability complaint concerning the extension of her probation period because they were presented out of time. It found that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so it had no jurisdiction to hear them; it also stated that those complaints would have failed if jurisdiction had existed.
The claimant's two remaining complaints of discrimination arising from disability both failed. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing and does not set out further written reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time and that it lacked jurisdiction. The judgment adds that the complaint would have failed if jurisdiction had existed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The discrimination arising from disability complaint concerning extension of the claimant's probation period was presented out of time; the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time and that it lacked jurisdiction. The judgment adds that the complaint would have failed if jurisdiction had existed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's two remaining complaints of discrimination arising from disability both failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.