Case 2220047/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Ward v C McAteer FAO The Sports PR Company — 2025
- Case reference
- 2220047/2024
- Decision date
- 28 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Scott Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ward brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages in respect of unpaid pay for 1-12 March 2024, later amended to include a claim for holiday pay. The respondent did not attend the hearing; a late adjournment request and a strike-out application were both refused, the judge noting that the respondent had not filed witness statements, had not confirmed readiness for hearing, and had given no adequate explanation for the late adjournment request.
On the wages claim, Employment Judge Scott accepted the company accountant's payslip showing pay for 1-14 March 2024 of £1,031.75, giving a gross daily rate of £73.70, and found the respondent had advanced no cogent reason for non-payment. The deductions for the period to 12 March 2024 totalled £884.36. The strike-out application based on the claimant allegedly breaching contract by leaving early was dismissed as without merit.
On holiday pay, the tribunal calculated leave entitlement at 28 x (72/365) = 5.52 days, rounded up under the contract to 6 days, less 2 days taken, leaving 4 days outstanding. At the contractual rate of 1/260 of salary (£99.97/day) this produced £399.88, with £19.37 interest awarded at 8% over 221 days under regulation 30 WTR 1998. Further compensation under s.24(2) ERA 1996 for financial loss was refused as the claimant had not evidenced any loss such as bank charges or lost interest.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the respondent made an unlawful deduction from wages for the period 1-12 March 2024 (gross £884.36). | Upheld | — | £884 |
| Holiday pay | 4 days accrued untaken leave at £99.97/day = £399.88, plus £19.37 interest awarded under reg 30 WTR 1998 (Main v SpaDental [2024] EAT 200). | Upheld | — | £400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,304
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
- rule 3 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules (overriding objective)
- Attorney General v Barker [2000] 1 FLR 759
- Main v SpaDental [2024] EAT 200
- s.7 Employment Act 2008
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.