Case 2220313/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Self-represented For v Brett Newmark Beachclub Ltd (in liquidation) — 2018
- Case reference
- 2220313/2019
- Decision date
- 16 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Self-represented For
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 29 November 2019 before Employment Judge Gordon, with no appearance for the respondent, the tribunal decided that Miss D Barahona Guerra was employed by Brett Newmark. The judgment records that the claim had been filed on 30 January 2019.
The tribunal ordered Brett Newmark to pay £1,440 for unpaid wages covering the period 23 October 2018 to 16 November 2018. It also awarded £800 by way of compensation under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars. The judgment states that both sums were calculated gross and may be subject to deductions on payment, giving a total award of £2,240.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as unpaid wages for the period 23 October 2018 to 16 November 2018. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
| Other | Compensation under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,240
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.