Case 2220682/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Hemmings v Mishcon de Reya LLP — 2025
- Case reference
- 2220682/2024
- Decision date
- 3 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Hemmings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Walker, sitting alone at London Central by CVP on 11 and 12 December 2024, found that the Claimant Mr P Hemmings had been constructively unfairly dismissed by the Respondent, Mishcon De Reya LLP. The tribunal held that the Respondent had committed a repudiatory breach of contract in relation to the payment and transparency of commission due under the Claimant's offer letter dated 20 March 2020, and in relation to the manner in which a performance improvement process was initiated, and that the Claimant resigned in response to that breach without having waived or affirmed it.
On the unlawful deduction of wages claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal found that the deduction of the London Business School 'Mastering Digital Marketing Course' fee of £1,998 from the Claimant's final payslip was unlawful. The judge held that the Learning Agreement clawback clause could not be relied upon where the Claimant's resignation was in law a dismissal, that the Respondent could not benefit from its own breach, and that in any event the Respondent had waived the right to recover the fee when its representatives instructed the Claimant to stop the course without warning him of any liability.
In relation to commission said to be owed, the tribunal accepted that the final calculation prepared by Mr Tilley had resulted in payment of the full 3 per cent due, and that the outstanding balance of £2,070.43 had been paid. Remedy on the constructive unfair dismissal claim was reserved to a future hearing, at which the Respondent indicated it would argue for a reduction for contributory fault.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal succeeded. Tribunal found a repudiatory breach of contract by the Respondent (failure to pay commission properly owed and conduct relating to the performance improvement programme) and that the Claimant resigned in response. Remedy reserved to a future hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction in relation to the London Business School 'Mastering Digital Marketing Course' fee deducted from the Claimant's final payslip, in the sum of £1,998. The tribunal found the Respondent could not rely on the Learning Agreement repayment clause in circumstances of constructive dismissal, and that in any event the Respondent had waived the right to recover the fee when the Claimant was instructed to stop the course. A separate commission-related unlawful deduction argument was not upheld: the tribunal found that the outstanding balance of £2,070.43 in commission had in fact been paid. | Upheld | — | £1,998 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,998
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.