Case 2221329/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Gupta v SEaB Power Ltd t/a SEaB Energy Hearing at: London Central (CVP) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2221329/2024
- Decision date
- 11 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Gupta
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the tribunal recorded that Ms A Gupta's complaints for unpaid wages/breach of contract in relation to unpaid salary for January, February, March and April 2024 succeeded, together with her complaint for a statutory redundancy payment. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Baty on 3 September 2024 and sent to the parties on 11 September 2024.
The total award was £16,169.04 net. This comprised £1,400 for the statutory redundancy payment, calculated by applying the £700 maximum week's pay rate at the date of termination, 30 April 2024, to 2 complete years' continuous employment, and £14,769.04 for unpaid net salary for January to April 2024 at £3,692.26 per month.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent had already accounted for tax, national insurance contributions, and pension contributions in relation to the unpaid salary. The ordered payments were therefore to be made without any further deduction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent recorded that the claimant's complaints for unpaid wages/breach of contract in relation to unpaid salary for January, February, March and April 2024 succeeded. The award for this element was £14,769.04 net, described as the claimant's unpaid net salary for those four months at £3,692.26 per month. | Upheld | — | £14,769 |
| Redundancy | The claimant's complaint in relation to a statutory redundancy payment succeeded. The judgment states that the redundancy payment was calculated using a maximum week's pay of £700 multiplied by 2 complete years' continuous employment, giving £1,400. | Upheld | — | £1,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,169
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.