Case 2221544/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Gabriella Di Cristofaro v Ministry of Justice — 2025
- Case reference
- 2221544/2024
- Decision date
- 14 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Burns Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gabriella Di Cristofaro
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment for Gabriella Di Cristofaro v Ministry of Justice records that the hearing took place by video at London Central on 14 July 2025 before Employment Judge E Burns, with William Spooner appearing for the claimant and Paul Livingston for the respondent. The judgment states in full that the claimant's claim fails and is dismissed.
The document does not set out written reasons for the decision. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made at the hearing or is submitted within 14 days of the written record being sent. As a result, the written record does not explain the tribunal's factual findings, legal reasoning, or any remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment states only that the claimant's claim fails and is dismissed. It does not identify the pleaded heads of claim in the order itself. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.