Case 2222831/2024 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr D Gilmour, operations director — 2024
- Case reference
- 2222831/2024
- Decision date
- 26 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge P Klimov, sitting alone, heard the case by video on 20 September 2024. The tribunal found the claimant's holiday pay complaint well-founded and held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holiday accrued but untaken when employment ended.
The respondent was ordered to pay £380.60 gross and to account to HMRC for any tax and National Insurance due. The judgment also states that all other complaints in the claim were not well-founded and were dismissed, but it does not identify those complaints separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because holiday accrued but untaken at the end of employment was not paid. | Upheld | — | £381 |
| Other | The judgment states that all other complaints in the claim were not well-founded and were dismissed, but it does not itemise them separately. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £381
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.