Case 2223315/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Dahlke v Flightscope Mevo UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2223315/2024
- Decision date
- 24 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Dahlke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E Dahlke brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Flightscope Mevo UK Limited. The tribunal, sitting at London Central by CVP before Employment Judge Emery, held that the complaint was well-founded and that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed.
The judgment records a compensatory award of £6,470 together with £500 for loss of statutory rights. No separate basic award, injury to feelings award, or interest is recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no other claims are set out in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded and held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The judgment awarded a compensatory award of £6,470 and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £6,470 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,970
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £6,470
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.