Case 2225464/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Orabi v Selina Management Company UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2225464/2024
- Decision date
- 7 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris
- Venue
- Central London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Orabi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Orabi was employed by Selina Management Company UK Limited from 8 July 2019 to 31 May 2024 as Country Finance Director, on an annual salary of £80,000 with health insurance, a 3% employer pension contribution and three months' contractual notice. The respondent did not file an ET3 and did not attend the 30 September 2025 hearing, so the tribunal proceeded in its absence. The employment dispute followed the theft of the claimant's personal laptop in August 2023, a consequential loss from the respondent's German bank account, a disciplinary process, sickness absence, dismissal on 31 May 2024 and an unsuccessful appeal.
The tribunal held that the respondent had not shown a fair reason for dismissal, so the unfair dismissal claim succeeded. It also held that the respondent had not shown the claimant was in repudiatory breach of contract, so the notice pay claim succeeded. The judge explained that, because this was not a discrimination claim, the tribunal had no jurisdiction to award distress, inconvenience, reputational harm, injury to feelings or injury to health.
On remedy, the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence on mitigation, found no contributory fault and made no Polkey deduction. It awarded a basic award of £3,500 and a compensatory award for unfair dismissal, together with £20,000 for notice pay, £20,681.69 for accrued but untaken holiday, and £333.44 for expenses. The order recorded a total award of £77,444.49, with the first £30,000 of the unfair-dismissal compensation payable without deduction and the balance to be taxed as directed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The order at paragraph 2(a) awards a basic award of £3,500 and states a compensatory award of £36,429.36, but the reasons at paragraph 13(b) give a compensatory calculation of £32,929.36 plus £40 travel. The total award and the narrative in paragraph 13 support a total unfair-dismissal award of £36,429.36. | Upheld | — | £36,429 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay for the claimant's three-month contractual notice period; the tribunal found the respondent had not shown repudiatory breach by the claimant. | Upheld | — | £20,000 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but untaken holiday pay, including carried-over holiday and accrual up to termination. | Upheld | — | £20,682 |
| Other | Expenses reimbursement described in the reasons as 'Other payments'. | Upheld | — | £333 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £77,444
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,500
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £32,929
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- repudiatory breach of contract
- mitigation of losses
- Polkey deduction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.