Case 2228523/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v ISG Central Services Ltd (in Administration) and others — 2026
- Case reference
- 2228523/2024
- Decision date
- 13 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pirani Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made by consent under Rule 62. For the claimants named in Schedules 1-4, the Tribunal found that ISG Central Services Limited, ISG Construction Limited, ISG Interior Services Group UK Limited and ISG Retail Limited failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, and that the protective award claims under section 189 succeeded.
The Tribunal ordered each of those respondent companies to pay remuneration to the relevant scheduled claimants for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 20 September 2024. The judgment records that issues raised by the fifth respondent concerning establishment, representatives and whether there was consultation were resolved in favour of the claimants.
No costs order was made. The judgment states that any payments made by the companies, rather than the Secretary of State, would be paid as an unsecured dividend subject to preferential debts, that recoupment regulations apply, and that all remaining claims including unfair dismissal, constructive dismissal, arrears of pay, holiday pay, redundancy pay and notice pay were dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claims under section 189 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded against the first to fourth respondents for the claimants named in Schedules 1-4. The judgment ordered remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 20 September 2024, but did not state individual or aggregate monetary figures. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all remaining claims, including unfair dismissal, are dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that all remaining claims, including constructive dismissal, are dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all remaining claims, including arrears of pay, are dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that all remaining claims, including holiday pay, are dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that all remaining claims, including redundancy pay, are dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 62 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- section 188 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.