Case 2300003/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Thurdy Campbell v Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust & Others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300003/2020
- Decision date
- 11 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Thurdy Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 November 2020, Employment Judge Tsamados sat alone in a remote hearing by telephone conference call and dealt with Miss Thurdy Campbell's claims against Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust & Others. The judgment records that the hearing was held in private and that a face-to-face hearing was not practical because of Covid-19.
The tribunal dismissed the complaints of unfair dismissal, damages or breach of contract, unauthorised deductions from wages, disability discrimination, and religious and belief discrimination on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment contains no merits findings on liability because the claims did not proceed beyond withdrawal.
No monetary award or remedy assessment is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this complaint as 'damages or breach of contract' and dismisses it on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment refers to 'religious and belief discrimination' and dismisses it on withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.