Case 2300003/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S S Beaumont v Iceland Foods Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300003/2022
- Decision date
- 19 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S S Beaumont
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe preliminary hearing considered whether the claimant's race and sex discrimination claims were presented in time and, if not, whether time should be extended on just and equitable grounds. The tribunal found that the alleged discriminatory acts ran from January 2019 to 28 June 2021, so the deadline for those claims was 27 September 2021. The claimant contacted ACAS on 28 October 2021 and presented the claim on 2 January 2022, which meant the discrimination claims were over three months late.
The claimant said he did not begin to think about bringing a claim until dismissal and did not realise there was a different deadline for discrimination matters predating dismissal. The tribunal noted that he had sought advice after dismissal, but found no evidence that health issues prevented him from bringing a claim in time. It also noted that the discrimination allegations were not fully particularised until October 2023 and that the schedule of loss focused on unfair dismissal.
Balancing prejudice, the tribunal found that allowing the extension would require the respondent to defend allegations dating back to January 2019 to June 2021, depending on oral evidence, where some witnesses and one alleged perpetrator had left employment. Although the tribunal had some sympathy regarding the allegation about fabricated evidence on 9 May 2021, it found that admitting that allegation would also admit more historic allegations as a potential continuing act. It therefore refused an extension and struck out the race and sex discrimination claims for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal found the race discrimination complaints were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal found the sex discrimination complaints were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear them. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- just and equitable extension of time
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble and ors
- s33 Limitation Act 1980
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
- Wells Cathedral School Ltd and anor v Souter and anor
- Kumari v Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.