Case 2300005/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Taylor v Active Community Development CIC — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300005/2024
- Decision date
- 13 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Taylor brought claims for a redundancy payment, unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay, but this judgment dealt only with the redundancy payment claim; the unpaid wages and holiday pay claims were left to a separate Case Management Order. The respondent did not attend the hearing, having emailed the previous evening to say it could not attend and to ask for a postponement. The Tribunal proceeded in its absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure, noting that the live issue on the redundancy claim was a time-limit question based on undisputed dates.
The Tribunal applied s.164 ERA 1996, s.145(2)(a) ERA 1996 and s.207B ERA 1996. It found that the relevant date was 26 June 2023, Day A was 19 July 2023, and Day B was 2 August 2023. On that basis, the six-month limit was extended so that the deadline expired on 8 January 2024. Because the claim was presented on 1 January 2024, the Tribunal held that it had been brought in time.
The respondent’s response did not dispute the amount claimed for redundancy payment and expressly accepted that the payment was owed. The Tribunal therefore entered judgment for Mr Taylor in the sum of £3,365.25 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The Tribunal held the redundancy payment claim was brought in time under s.164 ERA 1996 and awarded the undisputed gross sum of £3,365.25. | Upheld | — | £3,365 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,365
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- s.164 ERA 1996
- s.145(2)(a) ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.