Case 2300009/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Rusu v JS White Construction UK Ltd, Alpine Civils Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300009/2023
- Decision date
- 10 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Rusu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by an order dated 09 May 2023, the respondent had been given an opportunity to make representations as to why the claim should not succeed or to request a hearing, because the respondent had not complied with that earlier order and the matter had not been actively pursued.
The respondent did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Burge struck out the response.
The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim or any monetary award. It states only that the respondent would be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the tribunal, but would be entitled to participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the response was struck out. It does not contain a substantive determination of the underlying unlawful deduction from wages claim or any remedy award. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.